What Is The Difference Between Internal Verification And Internal Moderation?

407206722 1075722730278308 361945764449019485 n

Do you ever get confused between internal verification and internal moderation? As a training provider, it’s important to understand the distinction between these quality assurance activities.

While internal verification and internal moderation both aim to ensure high standards, they have different functions within the assessment process. Knowing when each should be used allows organizations to comply with regulatory requirements.

Learning the key differences between internal verification and internal moderation will help training providers like yourself design robust yet compliant internal quality assurance systems.

Keep reading to discover what sets internal verification apart from internal moderation and how applying each correctly can benefit your training organization.

What is Internal Verification?

Internal verification is the review of assessment processes and decisions to ensure they are valid, reliable, fair, and consistent. It involves checking that:

  • Assessment criteria are fully understood by assessors
  • Evidence provided by learners is sufficient for the level studied
  • Judgements made by assessors regarding learner competency are sound

The internal verifier will sample assessments across all assessors. They provide feedback to assessors and may require remedial action if standards are not met.

Some key responsibilities of the internal verifier include:

  • Approving assessment materials
  • Monitoring assessment plans
  • Sampling learner assessments
  • Observation of assessments
  • Standardisation activities
  • Maintaining records

Internal verification ensures assessments align with awarding body criteria so qualifications are awarded properly. It maintains the quality, consistency, and fairness of assessment decisions.

What is Internal Moderation?

In contrast, internal moderation is the internal review of marked learner assignments and evidence. It often follows internal verification in the assessment cycle.

The internal moderator will review a sample of assessed work to check that:

  • Marking is consistent across assessors
  • Feedback given to learners is helpful for improvement
  • Grades awarded are a fair reflection of learner achievement
  • Reasons for decisions are clear

Key activities include:

  • Moderating a sample of learner evidence
  • Verifying grades and feedback
  • Ensuring standards over time are consistent
  • Identifying assessor development needs

This quality assures the assessment judgement and feedback so learners receive valid results. It prevents drift in assessment practice or criteria application.

Key Difference Between Internal Verification And Internal Moderation!

Here is a table comparing internal verification vs internal moderation:

ParameterInternal VerificationInternal Moderation
Performed ByIV (Internal Verifier)IM (Internal Moderator)
PurposeConfirm assessment procedures followedCheck consistency of assessment decisions
ActivitiesVerify assessor practices pre-assessmentModify assessor judgements post-assessment
ChecksAssessment planning, preparation, executionInterpretation of standards, grading
FocusValidate assessment process complianceStandardize assessment decisions across learners
MethodsAudit documents, observe assessments etc.Review samples of student work
ActionsProvide assessors feedback to improve skillsEnsure grades are aligned and adjusted if required
FrequencyPrior to finalizing assessment outcomeAfter assessment outcomes are determined
EmphasizesAssessor capability and competenceComparability and calibration of assessment decisions
EnhancesRobustness of assessment methodologyFairness and reliability of grading

In summary, internal verification checks the assessment system before outcomes, while internal moderation checks judgments after outcomes to enable standardization.

When to Use Internal Verification vs Moderation?

 Internal verification:

  • Checks the assessment process is valid before use
  • Maintains assessment quality and consistency

Internal moderation:

  • Occurs after assessments take place
  • Focuses on the assessment judgment and standard

So internal verification validates the assessment, while internal moderation evaluates the assessment decision. This distinction is important for regulated sectors to implement quality assurance effectively according to regulatory guidelines.

Our Final Word

In summary, internal verification looks at the assessment process, while internal moderation evaluates assessment decisions and judgments. By understanding this key difference, training providers can design quality assurance systems that meet sector standards and safeguard the quality of learning.

Looking to boost your career in quality assurance? Take the next step with Advance Training Academy’s Level 4 Internal Quality Assurance (IQA) Course.

This course is designed to empower professionals with advanced skills and knowledge, which is the key to excelling in quality assurance practices.

Whether you want to enhance your career prospects or contribute to organizational excellence, our Level 4 IQA Course is essential. Don’t wait; book today and embark on your journey to becoming a qualified IQA professional.

Enrollment Options: To enroll in this course, you have two convenient options:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *